“Including a filter won't fix a poor search but incorrect use of a filter can undermine an okay search” - Kate Misso
Limiters are database features that you can check to instantly limit your results. Common limiters include language, date range, full-text, and publication type. The issue with limiters in a systematic review is twofold:
Avoid using database limiters at all during your evidence synthesis review. With a quality search and your critical appraisal process, you shouldn’t need to rely on limiters to sort through your results for you.
Published (or sometimes called validated) search hedges or filters are search strings that can be used to narrow your search to certain criteria to retrieve relevant articles. These search strings have been tested to ensure that they are the most accurate as possible at returning relevant results. Search hedges/filters are different from database limiters because they are actually search strings rather than buttons you can click inside the database. The creators of these search strings then can publish these hedges in articles or on websites. Common criteria for hedges include:
While there are common search hedges, you can always check to see if a search hedge has been created for a specific concept in your research (for example, PubMed has search filters for health disparities as well as COVID-19). Three very important things to remember with search hedges:
You can always use a search hedge as a jumping off point to help you create your search strategy or to make sure your search strategy is on the right track.